The Emerging New Consciousness

7

 
carina

All things must pass. Especially champion NFL teams. So go placidly amid the noise and haste, and remember what little value there may be in a running game. Like, far out, man.

 

In the wake of the Saints’ dismantling of the Miami Dolphins, amid the euphoria of starting 4-0 and the sweet, sweet schadenfreude of seeing the Falcons implode all over the rug, a brand new meme has emerged. It’s this: who the hell needs a running game, anyway? We’re doing juuuuusssst fine as things are.

Forget those old shibboleths…like, “to be a champion you need to run the ball and stop the run.” Or, “a strong running game sets up the pass.” Or even, “everything starts with the line.” Those are, like, so yesterday, man. A useless vestige of a corrupt and oppressive past. We want to be free to throw the ball whenever we feel like it, without having to worry if great-grandpa might not approve. This is the dawn of a new age, man—a new consciousness, even. So mellow out, because, you know, a running game is not healthy for children and other living things. Or something.

So if you’re a Saints fan, rejoice! No longer need you worry that your team currently ranks a paltry 25th in rushing, or that the offensive line is allowing sacks at almost twice the rate of last season. Just bomb ‘em back to the stone age, baby! Or, to use one of those newfangled phrases: it’s all good.

Here’s the thing: I think they’re right.

First, credit where it’s due. It was Angry Who Dat who brought this to my attention. He referenced The Goat over at Girod Street End Zone, who pondered the implications of the Saints’ current youth movement on defense; but it was AWD who pulled it all together. Do, by all means, give close attention to both posts…but here’s the money quote:

Can a team with a top-10 defense, allowing under 20 points a game, with a passing attack that is arguably the best professional football has ever seen, survive and win everything without even a hint of a running game?

Well, why the fuck not?

Why indeed? For years, we pined for the chance to see Drew paired with a defense that could play like it wasn’t a black-and-gold turnstile. Now, suddenly, he’s paired with a defense that plays like a black-and-gold Kursk salient. And we’re going to cry about the running game?

I did some checking, because it seemed to me I remembered some other teams with running problems recently. Teams like, oh, the Super Bowl Champion Pittsburgh Steelers, and the Super Bowl Champion Green Bay Packers, and the Super Bowl Champion New York Giants. Seems that in the past dozen years since the dawning of this here millennium, champions with good running games have been anomalies.

Year Team Rank YPC

2012 Baltimore 11th 4.3
2011 New York 32nd 3.5
2010 Green Bay 24th 3.8
2009 New Orleans 6th 4.5
2008 Pittsburgh 23rd 3.7
2007 New York 4th 4.6
2006 Indianapolis 18th 4.0
2005 Pittsburgh 5th 4.0
2004 New England 7th 4.1
2003 New England 27th 3.4
2002 Tampa Bay 27th 3.8
2001 New England 13th 3.8

There are a few good teams sprinkled through there: a 4th, a 5th, a 6th, a 7th. But no real juggernauts, any of them. And then there are the appallingly bad running teams—a 23rd, a 24th, two 27ths, a 32nd! What the hell business did the Giants have in the Super Bowl when they could only rush for 3.5 yards per carry?

And yet.

The Saints currently aren’t quite playing at the Giants’ level: they’re only gaining 3.4 yards per carry—exactly what the 2003 Patriots averaged when they won their second Lombardi. Those Patriots also were the 9th-ranked passing team—and, more importantly, the 7th-ranked defense. Currently, the Saints are ranked 2nd in passing and 6th in defense. I’d say this constitutes an inside track to our second Lombardi. Maybe.

It will all depend on two things: luck on the injury front (we don’t want to lose…hah, you thought I was going to speak names), and continuing stellar play by the defense. If those two trends continue, the Saints are going to be a difficult out. For anyone.

And there’s no reason to believe things won’t keep on keeping on. I suggested a couple weeks ago that you could tell who the Saints were going to be pretty much from the beginning. Well, maybe I was full of shit, because at that time I misdiagnosed 2013 as a repeat of 2010. Actually, the team is playing significantly better—the point differential is more than 5 points in favor of the 2013 squad. That extra 5 points wouldn’t have gained us a whole lot in 2010—just one more victory, to improve to 12-4. But that win would have come against the Falcons, earning us the division title and home field advantage throughout the playoffs. And what a difference that would have been.

AWD sorta backhandedly endorsed my thesis that the Saints give us an early tell:

Frankly, I don’t see the running game getting better. The offensive line isn’t going to experience any enormous changes this year, Mark Ingram is what he is, Khiry Robinson can close but apparently not do much else, and Pierre Thomas and Darren Sproles are too busy demoralizing secondaries to fuck around with 4-yard runs between the tackles.

So this offense may just be what it’s going to be already – I hope I’m wrong – but I’m okay with that.

I’m okay with that, too…just so long as the defense is what it’s going to be already. And there’s also this: even if the Saints start out as a Ford or a Ferrari, and never change from one to the other in-season, they also start in first gear. I figure they’re in third right about now. Just think of the mess in the NFL when they shift into fifth.

Posted by Himself in 2013 Season, Game Day | 7 comments

7 Comments

Please note: This Comments section is provided as a forum in which visitors may express themselves freely, as in any other public forum in America. However, slanderous, threatening, abusive, or off-topic replies, or spam of any kind, are subject to deletion. (Threats, for that matter, will be promptly reported to the proper authorities.) We also reserve the right to terminate user accounts at any time, at our discretion. Readers should not assume any endorsement by Who Dat Social Club of any opinion or assertion of fact occurring in any comment (other than those generated as replies by the writers of Who Dat Social Club), or linked to by any comment. Having said all this: have at it, and thank your forefathers for their wisdom in guaranteeing free speech, and Al Gore for inventing the Internet.

  • FriarBobOctober 3, 2013 at 7:42 pm

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote

     

    Well part of me wants you to be part-wrong. Not about NEEDING the run game, mind you. Just that we won’t ever find one. I want our guys to get better, such that at the end of the year, they are so OBVIOUSLY the best team on the field that even the biased MVP voters finally admit they’ve shafted Drew over the years.

    But since that will never happen, I suppose I’d just settle for Peyton stealing the MVP trophy again and Drew getting the ring again.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote
    • HimselfOctober 3, 2013 at 9:27 pm

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote

       

      Based on the way he’s playing now, if Peyton wins another MVP it will be justified. Then again, remember this: they give the award for your performance in the regular season. I feel pretty confident that Peyton Manning and John Fox are an eminently beatable combination in the playoffs.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote
      • FriarBobOctober 3, 2013 at 10:15 pm

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote

         

        Actually, I kinda have to agree. But that would almost make it fair if for once instead Drew got it. After all, Peyton stole at least two of his previously, it’s only fair for Drew to eventually return the favor… right?

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote
  • Saint ChristopherOctober 4, 2013 at 1:24 am

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote

     

    But then there’s the weather…

    I have visions of the NFC 2006 championship game when we went up I-55 to Chi-Town:

    Dome team + snow = no Superbowl for you! Thirty-nine to 14? Jesus Christ–what a nightmare.

    I’m biting my nails in anticipation for dome-team-proof conditions in outdoor places like, oh I don’t know, Chicago, New England, Seattle…

    Isn’t it a nice luxury to have a run game in your back pocket just in case they decide to HOLD A MOTHERF@*KIN’ SUPERBOWL IN G@#DAMNED NEW JERSEY?!?

    And I’m not the only one who thinks so. I seem to remember a sagely old bartender giving us some sort of prophetic warning a while back:

    http://www.whodatsocialclub.com/payton-to-saints-put-on-the-cleats/

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote
    • HimselfOctober 4, 2013 at 7:23 am

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote

       

      Yep. And I still believe that. But I’m done worrying about it.

      Maybe the answer, if it comes to that, is to put a bounty on the other team’s running back.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote
  • Breesus Christ SuperstarOctober 5, 2013 at 7:33 pm

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote

     

    The only thing running plays have been this year are drive killers.
    Considering we lead the league in TOP by a considerable margin, it’s not like we need to run to control the clock.
    Our red zone offense is pathetic so far because we have stubbornly insisted on trying to run it in rather than pass.
    I want to see how big of a lead we can get with an agressive passing offense combined with an agressive defense. Shock and awe. Using this approach in the last two games, Arizona and Miami never knew what hit them, and by halftime it was all over.
    You only need running balance if your opponent can stop your passing game. Once you are up by 3 TDs it doesn’t matter if Ingram averages 1.8 yds per carry, game over.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote
  • FriarBobOctober 10, 2013 at 5:46 pm

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote

     

    Hey comeon slowpoke. Surely you have SOMETHING to say about finally conquering sod-free Soldier Field… right?

    And thanks to whomever I stole that nickname for the field, that was a great rename for that putrid field.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote

Leave a comment

Create an Account | Already a member?

Archives

Categories

Blogroll

The Crass Upstarts

“A riot is an ugly thing.”

The Legitimate Media

“Now, gods, stand up for bastards!”

The Establishment

“Love ’em or hate’em, ya gotta love ’em. And hate ’em.”

Support Troops

“In token of our appreciation for services rendered, this fine, fat link.”

Because We Care

“FYYFF.”