Daily Special, June 27, 2012

11

 

 

Here’s good news: today we get to discuss Drew Brees instead of Bountygate. So let’s find out what Drew thinks about Bountygate.

We’ll get to that in a minute. But first, “I would never sit out a football season.” That was the blockbuster statement the Brees made on ESPN’s Outside the Lines Tuesday.

“I would never sit out a football season. I love the game too much. I love my team too much. But obviously, there’s a lot that can happen between now and then. So, let’s just hope we can get a long-term deal done.”

That sounds like great news…but what does it mean? Bradley Handwerger opines that what might sound like a PR gaffe is actually a deliberate PR play. I’m not ready to go that far, because I still can’t see that Brees stands to get anything out of it in terms of salary negotiations. But I think Handwerger is onto something when he suggests Brees is in a no-lose situation. This probably means that Drew is satisfied with the current Saints offer as a fall-back position. He’s still waiting for the outcome of the grievance hearing on his salary cap status, which happens…um, today; if it goes his way, he can use that as leverage for more money out of the Saints. But if he goes against him–and it will–he has an offer he’s already satisfied with under the circumstances.

So when he says he won’t sit out, he means he’ll be playing under contract, not under the tag. And that means this could all be over by the end of this week. And what a relief that would be.

Especially to Mickey Loomis. This is surely the offseason from Hell for poor Mickey, who has done a magnificent job with free agency, but can’t finalize the roster—can’t even start signing draft picks—until Drew signs and he knows how much money he has left. Meanwhile, Brees’ camp has unleashed a particularly low tactic: they’ve asked the league to investigate whether the Saints are “acting in good faith” in the negotiations. Seems Drew Brees is a big union guy, and maybe the Saints are holding that against him.

Gimme a break. Mickey wants to live, okay? Brees will be signed the instant Brees says “yes” to an offer. And then, the rookie contracts will fall like dominoes. It all hinges on Drew, and he, Condon, and the NFLPA all know it. I thought better of Drew than to try something like this.

Now, on to Bountygate. Brees has been front and center in defense of the players and coaches. He told Dan Patrick “I’ve been informed a lot of those coaches feel there are further sanctions being held over their head if they don’t cooperate with the investigation. If they were to speak out on behalf of the players, maybe that’s the fear they have.”

Entirely reasonable. That explains why Payton is keeping such a low profile. It doesn’t explain why Joe Vitt has been in Roger Goodell’s face over the latest evidence leaks. Politely, but still in his face. I’m liking Vitt more and more. He might wind up being a lousy game manager, but he’s sure going to have the loyalty of this team.

But Brees went farther than that with the accusations:

“Have I been told that some of the statements that were supposedly released have been said by the coaches were actually statements that were actually drawn up and manufactured by the NFL and then basically put out there as their words?” Brees asked. “Yes. If that’s the case, that’s unfortunate. It makes them sound like they’re trying to manufacture something, fabricate it or hide the truth and the facts.”

“To this point, none of us have seen any proof that would justify the punishment or show that there was indeed a pay-to-injure scheme going on,” Brees said. “I think they’ve tried to confuse the issue by combining pay-to-injure with pay-for-performance, which are obviously two very different things. These are heinous accusations.”

This might not sound like much, but it’s potentially a very big deal. I’ve written before–yesterday, in fact–that the statements released by Payton and Williams were very carefully crafted to avoid any actual admission that the NFL’s accusations were true. They were, in effect, non-denial denials. So if those statements were actually crafted by the league, that would constitute strong evidence of malice–playing right into the hands of Jonathan Vilma and any other players who choose to file suit against Roger Goodell or the league.

And all it would take to prove it would be the testimony of the coaches involved…who aren’t really big Roger Goodell fans right about now. Eh, probably a pipe dream, but this trip seems so real!

The NFL, predictably, trotted out Reichsminister für Propaganda Greg Aiello:

We completely disagree. The evidence is overwhelming that the Saints conducted a prohibited pay-for-performance/bounty program for three seasons that offered rewards to players if an opponent was “carted off” or “knocked out” with an injury. The investigation was thorough and includes statements from multiple sources with first-hand knowledge about the details of the program, corroborating documentation and other evidence. The enforcement of the bounty rule is important to protect players that are put at risk by this kind of scheme. Certainly, Drew Brees would not want to be the target in a bounty scheme and that is why we must eliminate bounties from football.

This, despite numerous attempts from numerous sources saying the same thing: that terms such as “cart-off” and “knockout,” not to mention “kill the head,” were simply hyperbole…kinda like “jacked up,” but that term is probably trademarked by now. It serves to demonstrate all over again what many apologists for the Saints have been saying for months: this is an argument over rhetoric.

And Greg Romeus is still the property of the Saints. Maybe next year.

On the Jukebox

No particular reason. This doesn’t tie in with anything, but then again…it’s Peter Gabriel. Who needs a better reason?

Posted by Himself in Daily Specials | 11 comments

11 Comments

Please note: This Comments section is provided as a forum in which visitors may express themselves freely, as in any other public forum in America. However, slanderous, threatening, abusive, or off-topic replies, or spam of any kind, are subject to deletion. (Threats, for that matter, will be promptly reported to the proper authorities.) We also reserve the right to terminate user accounts at any time, at our discretion. Readers should not assume any endorsement by Who Dat Social Club of any opinion or assertion of fact occurring in any comment (other than those generated as replies by the writers of Who Dat Social Club), or linked to by any comment. Having said all this: have at it, and thank your forefathers for their wisdom in guaranteeing free speech, and Al Gore for inventing the Internet.

  • The Angry Who DatJune 27, 2012 at 9:34 am

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote

     

    That Jason LaCanfora story, shit.

    What if it’s true? No, no, don’t give me that crap, I wouldn’t put such stupidity past Benson for a damn second. NEVER FORGET 2005.

    Does anyone else feel like the sky is getting closer? I’m having trouble breathing.

    I’m gonna go wrap myself in tin foil and drink myself into a stupor until the arbitrator makes an decision on the franchise tag. Hope my boss doesn’t mind.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote
    • HimselfJune 27, 2012 at 1:39 pm

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote

       

      I never for a moment considered that it might be more than a negotiating ploy…but damn it, now you’ve got ME worried, too.

      You want to get drunk? Here, this’ll do it:

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote
      • PhilistineJune 27, 2012 at 5:10 pm

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote

         

        Then there’s always this:

        Ah, good times (I think – I don’t remember a lot of them).

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote
        • FriarBobJune 27, 2012 at 5:15 pm

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote

           

          Hopefully you weren’t like my ex-roommate, spending the next few hours puking. Hmm, maybe that’s why he didn’t learn his lesson the first time, he didn’t remember it.

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote
          • PhilistineJune 27, 2012 at 5:20 pm

            Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote

             

            I spent quite awhile in the bathroom at Tipitina’s one summer night long ago after a few too many 151 sours – I wish I didn’t remember that one. :-P

            Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote
            • PhilistineJune 27, 2012 at 5:25 pm

              Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote

               

              That event probably precipitated a movement to something less lethal – like Sterno.

              Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote
  • FrenchieJune 27, 2012 at 10:00 am

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote

     

    Beautiful song. Love me some Peter Gabriel.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote
  • PhilistineJune 27, 2012 at 5:17 pm

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote

     

    I’m glad to hear Brees say that he’ll play. Given what happened to his shoulder in San Diego while playing under the franchise tag, and what that did to his value as a free agent, I wouldn’t have been surprised if he decided to stay on the sidelines. I agree with your assessment; an offer is sitting on the table, it’s acceptable to him, and he’ll take it if the upcoming ruling goes against him.

    Here’s to Brees finishing his career here in New Orleans. *–clinks glass with plotzed Angry Who Dat.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote
    • HimselfJune 27, 2012 at 7:05 pm

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote

       

      Does AWD get more angry when he’s drunk, or less? Inquiring minds want to know.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote
      • PhilistineJune 27, 2012 at 7:49 pm

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote

         

        Based on the first comment here, I sincerely hope he mellows out when drunk. If that’s not the case, he’ll be going all helter skelter shortly, after what you served him.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote
        • HimselfJune 27, 2012 at 8:23 pm

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote

           

          Hey, I just handle supply, not demand.

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please log in to vote

Leave a comment

Create an Account | Already a member?

Archives

Categories

Blogroll

The Crass Upstarts

“A riot is an ugly thing.”

The Legitimate Media

“Now, gods, stand up for bastards!”

The Establishment

“Love ’em or hate’em, ya gotta love ’em. And hate ’em.”

Support Troops

“In token of our appreciation for services rendered, this fine, fat link.”

Because We Care

“FYYFF.”